I remember it as if it were yesterday. I was 14 in 1973. The Supreme Court Decision making abortion legal in all 50 states throughout all 9 months of pregnancy was big news and was constantly on the radio and television. Frankly, I was bored with it all. I remember my mother and grandmother being alternatively sad and angry about it, but they were frequently that way about current events – my family was very political and very outspoken! Still there was something about this story that seemed to affect my mother a little differently from anything I had witnessed before. This news made her cry.
But at 14 I was still very innocent and very naive. I wasn’t even sure what an abortion was. Our radio station was always tuned to classical music, which meant that I received a healthy dose of NPR coming and going to school. From that I source I understood that this was a good decision somehow for me and other girls. It was something akin to getting the vote, at least from that perspective. I don’t remember anything being said about it at my Catholic High School, but the ideology I was picking up there had a lot of feminist overtones to it. I could be whatever, or do whatever I wanted to do, according to my teachers and my peer group. If that was so, then abortion, whatever that really was, sounded like a good thing.
I do remember sitting at my kitchen table at the old farmhouse, listening to yet another story about abortion in the news, and making the conscious decision that this was something I was going to make up my own mind about. I was going to consciously choose to make up my own mind and not just take a position because it was my mother’s position or my grandmother’s. If none of my friends, or any one at school thought this was such a big deal (or so it seemed to my young mind at the time), then why was my mother making such a big deal about this? Perhaps this was my own first logical fallacy then, an appeal to the majority. My mother must surely be wrong, if no one else feels as she does.
So I attempted to muster up an air of maturity and asked my mother point blank, “Well what’s so wrong about abortion anyway? Why do you think it’s so bad?”
My mother calmly and matter-of-factly answered me. “Because abortion is killing a little baby in its mother’s womb. It’s a baby.” I don’t remember that she over-dramatized it. In fact I don’t even think she quit eating her breakfast. But she said something that I had not heard in all of the rhetoric I had been exposed to, “baby.”
I consciously made up my own mind right on the spot. I would look for another issue to be on the opposite side of from my mother. On this issue, on abortion, she was right.
Years passed and I grew up to be very pro-life. The babies at the center of this issue were never lost in the pages and pages of words I read and listened to. It’s a baby.
And my mother’s simple answer set an example for me as well. I have explained this issue to my children in much the same way. It’s a baby. It’s a person. We don’t kill innocent people on purpose. When we keep those facts in mind, it makes all of the fallacies of the pro-abortion folks easy to see through and answer.
As a an aside, 20 years, later on the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision, I gave and received my most perfect example of those truths. My son Sam was born that day. He will be 15 tomorrow! I tell Sam all the time there is a purpose and a reason for that. IF he’s open to it, God will show him what it is. But in the meantime, Sam remains my best testimony and witness against R v. W. My mom thinks so too.
Please browse my eBay items!
Visit my new Amazon Store!
I’ve read through a lot of your archives and have been especially interested in your abortion posts because I have opposite views to you. So my following comment doesn’t perfectly match up to this post but is something that I’ve been wanting to write about and will take this as the most recent opportunity.
I once read an article on the abortion debate that suggested that no politician had any real interest in overturning Roe V Wade. Granted, I can’t remember the name or credentials of the pundit claiming this nor can I provide a link.
The logic is that politicians are first and foremost politicians and are seeking to raise money and rally votes more than they are seeking to really make a difference. Maybe you have more faith in your guys than that, but I believe that to be true of all politicians- my own side and all others. They have their principles but are willing to compromise those principles for the sake of politics. They probably rationalise it as the need to stay in power and make a difference rather than lose power and not be capable of achieving anything.
Abortion rights are a huge deal to many people. People will donate to campaigns and turn up to vote in the hopes of ending abortion rights. If abortion rights were completely revoked many of these people would lessen their support and maybe not bother voting at all, because victory had already been achieved.
Politicians know this, and know it is therefore not in their interest to overturn abortion rights, but to keep it topical and give the pro-life side small victories to keep them on side.
I don’t say this to be antagonistic, but to point out that maybe the way to reducing abortion doesn’t reside in politics. It’s in teaming up with the pro-choice people to find out how to reduce the need for abortion. We pro-choice folks aren’t exactly cheerleaders for abortion. We would love a world where abortion didn’t exist because it wasn’t needed or wanted.
Go back 140 years or so and plug in “slavery” in place of “abortion” and see if that changes your position on “all” politicians.
I’m not American, so I do not have detailed knowledge of the abolition of slavery. Is it relevant?
Yea I think so. In the early 1800s slavery was legal in this country. It was the political hot button that abortion is today.
True, but didn’t Lincoln acknowledge slavery was an injustice, but say something to the effect that he would allow it to continue if it kept the union intact? He had his principles, but he would have set them aside if it made the most political sense. (You can correct me if I am wrong. I admit I have had no schooling in American history).
In any case, my point was that politicians serve themselves rather than serve the people. The tell you anything to get elected and then only do just enough to get re-elected. People had abortions before it was legal and they will keep having abortions if it is recriminalised. If you really want to end abortion you have to address the reasons women choose abortion in the first place.
My point was that with frank honesty my mother was able to simply explain what abortion was and thus convince me of the rightness of being pro-life.
In that way she really did prevent abortions at least on a micro level – neither my sister or I ever had one.
That was also sort of my point.