Recommended Articles

6 Comments

  1. I’ve read through a lot of your archives and have been especially interested in your abortion posts because I have opposite views to you. So my following comment doesn’t perfectly match up to this post but is something that I’ve been wanting to write about and will take this as the most recent opportunity.
    I once read an article on the abortion debate that suggested that no politician had any real interest in overturning Roe V Wade. Granted, I can’t remember the name or credentials of the pundit claiming this nor can I provide a link.
    The logic is that politicians are first and foremost politicians and are seeking to raise money and rally votes more than they are seeking to really make a difference. Maybe you have more faith in your guys than that, but I believe that to be true of all politicians- my own side and all others. They have their principles but are willing to compromise those principles for the sake of politics. They probably rationalise it as the need to stay in power and make a difference rather than lose power and not be capable of achieving anything.

    Abortion rights are a huge deal to many people. People will donate to campaigns and turn up to vote in the hopes of ending abortion rights. If abortion rights were completely revoked many of these people would lessen their support and maybe not bother voting at all, because victory had already been achieved.
    Politicians know this, and know it is therefore not in their interest to overturn abortion rights, but to keep it topical and give the pro-life side small victories to keep them on side.

    I don’t say this to be antagonistic, but to point out that maybe the way to reducing abortion doesn’t reside in politics. It’s in teaming up with the pro-choice people to find out how to reduce the need for abortion. We pro-choice folks aren’t exactly cheerleaders for abortion. We would love a world where abortion didn’t exist because it wasn’t needed or wanted.

  2. Go back 140 years or so and plug in “slavery” in place of “abortion” and see if that changes your position on “all” politicians.

  3. I’m not American, so I do not have detailed knowledge of the abolition of slavery. Is it relevant?

  4. Yea I think so. In the early 1800s slavery was legal in this country. It was the political hot button that abortion is today.

  5. True, but didn’t Lincoln acknowledge slavery was an injustice, but say something to the effect that he would allow it to continue if it kept the union intact? He had his principles, but he would have set them aside if it made the most political sense. (You can correct me if I am wrong. I admit I have had no schooling in American history).

    In any case, my point was that politicians serve themselves rather than serve the people. The tell you anything to get elected and then only do just enough to get re-elected. People had abortions before it was legal and they will keep having abortions if it is recriminalised. If you really want to end abortion you have to address the reasons women choose abortion in the first place.

  6. My point was that with frank honesty my mother was able to simply explain what abortion was and thus convince me of the rightness of being pro-life.

    In that way she really did prevent abortions at least on a micro level – neither my sister or I ever had one.

    That was also sort of my point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *